|
Post by rihawk on Feb 14, 2012 23:47:33 GMT -5
I have been around this league since the mid 90's and i still don't understand why there is no division tie breaker...this isn't girl scouts where everyone gets a medal....there should be a tie breaker between divisional winners if more than one team tie for the division lead.....can someone please explain why there is no tie breaker?
|
|
|
Post by helper on Feb 15, 2012 3:50:09 GMT -5
It's the same for all sports. All co champs even though there is usually head to head results. For example EWG beat TG by 1 technically they should be sole champs.
|
|
|
Post by tapout56 on Feb 15, 2012 12:01:51 GMT -5
I have a better question if u r in the north beat all teams in north but loose two to the south how come u r not north champs
|
|
|
Post by zeke3240 on Feb 15, 2012 12:50:53 GMT -5
I have a better question if u r in the north beat all teams in north but loose two to the south how come u r not north champs that makes absolutly no sense, look at other sports--its always total record---if the patriots beat every team in division and lose to a few nfc teams on schedule- but lets say the jets end up with a better overall record, the jets are division champions---take care of your business in ALL matches and you wont have an issue
|
|
|
Post by allheart on Feb 15, 2012 13:35:32 GMT -5
What would have happened if BH tied Cumberland?
|
|
|
Post by jzappa on Feb 15, 2012 13:56:36 GMT -5
Cumby gets the win as Gordon beats BH coach in steel cage match.
|
|
|
Post by rulesguy on Feb 15, 2012 14:26:22 GMT -5
Tie is a Tie in RI... We do not use tie breakers for dual meet competition.
|
|
|
Post by helper on Feb 15, 2012 14:45:53 GMT -5
Then they'd have the same exact record and would be co division champs, jus like if WV happens to knock off Cumb tonight they will have same record as BH again and be co champs (that is as long as NP doesn't beat BH Thursday night)
|
|